News

Pakistani airstrikes kill 36 civilians in Afghanistan and wound 160, officials say

Pakistani Airstrikes in Afghanistan Result in Significant Civilian Casualties Pakistani airstrikes kill 36 civilians in Afghanistan - Overnight airstrikes

Desk News
Published June 30, 2026
Reading time 4 minutes
Conversation No comments
Residents walk through the rubble after what Taliban officials said were Pakistani airstrikes a day earlier that killed civilians, including children, in the village of Mandokhail, Chamkani district, Paktia province, Afghanistan, Monday, June 29, 2026. (AP Photo/Saifullah Zahir)

Pakistani Airstrikes in Afghanistan Result in Significant Civilian Casualties

Pakistani airstrikes kill 36 civilians in Afghanistan – Overnight airstrikes conducted by Pakistani security forces in Afghanistan have led to the deaths of at least 36 civilians and injuries to more than 160 others, according to statements from Afghan officials on Monday. The attacks, which occurred along the border, marked a sharp rise in hostilities between the two neighboring countries. An Afghan government representative hinted that the strikes would provoke a retaliatory response, underscoring the growing tension in the region.

Political Response and Justification

Pakistan’s government cited militant attacks within its borders as the reason for the cross-border strikes. Information Minister Attaullah Tarar asserted that security forces had launched a ground operation late Sunday, targeting militant strongholds and safe havens. The operation reportedly eliminated 29 fighters, with Tarar sharing footage on X depicting the destruction of weapons and ammunition stores in Paktia, Paktika, and Kunar provinces.

“Pakistan’s counter-terrorism campaign will continue at full pace to eradicate foreign-sponsored and supported terrorism from our country,” Tarar declared.

Afghanistan’s Ministry of Information and Culture denounced the strikes as “cowardly acts of aggression” and “brutal attacks” in Paktia, Paktika, and Kunar provinces. Deputy minister Hayatullah Mohajer Farahi emphasized that the nation would respond “in due time,” while Taliban deputy spokesperson Hamdullah Fitrat provided specific details about the targeted areas. He reported that a home in Chamkani district, Paktia, was hit, killing an elderly man and a child while wounding several family members. A second strike during the rescue attempt left 28 villagers dead and 158 injured.

Further casualties were reported in Giyan district, Paktika, where another home was struck, resulting in the deaths of six civilians—primarily women and children. In Kunar province, a civilian residence was damaged but did not claim any lives, though it destroyed approximately 30 livestock. These incidents have intensified the conflict’s impact on local communities, with Afghan officials accusing Pakistan of escalating hostilities without clear justification.

Accusations and Diplomatic Protests

On Monday, both nations took diplomatic steps to address the situation. Afghanistan and Pakistan summoned their top diplomats to express grievances over the strikes. Zia Ahmad Takal, the deputy spokesperson for the Afghan Foreign Ministry, criticized Islamabad for “repeatedly blaming Afghanistan for security incidents within Pakistan” without presenting “credible evidence.” He argued that such actions “seriously harm the trust between the two countries” and undermine regional stability.

“Pakistan should look inward and take effective action against its own terror infrastructure,” Takal stated.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs countered by accusing Afghan nationals of participating in recent attacks. It called for a protest against the involvement of Afghan citizens in incidents like the assault on the Rangers regional headquarters in Karachi, which killed three soldiers. The attack, claimed by Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, prompted Pakistan to assert that Afghan soil continues to be used as a base for cross-border terrorism.

Meanwhile, India dismissed Pakistan’s claims of involvement, with Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal calling the allegations “baseless.” He urged Pakistan to “take credible action against the terror infrastructure on its territory,” suggesting that the blame should be directed inward rather than placed on Afghanistan.

Militant Dynamics and Regional Implications

The recent operations follow a pattern of militant activity targeting Pakistani security forces. Officials have attributed most of the violence to the Pakistani Taliban, or TTP, and affiliated groups. Despite their separation from the Afghan Taliban, which regained control in 2021, these groups share ideological ties and operational support.

Pakistan uses the term “Khawarij” to describe its own Taliban and other militants it claims are backed by India. Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, a breakaway faction of the TTP, was implicated in the Karachi attack, which preceded the cross-border strikes. Following the incident, Pakistani police released a statement from the wounded Afghan detainee, who admitted the attack was planned by Jamaat-ul-Ahrar. However, the detainee’s confession remains under scrutiny, with questions about whether it was made under duress.

The timing of the strikes also raised concerns. They occurred less than three weeks after Pakistan had previously launched airstrikes against militant hideouts in Afghanistan, ending a month of relative calm. The current escalation reflects ongoing efforts by Islamabad to dismantle terrorist networks, but it has drawn criticism from Kabul for its civilian toll and alleged provocation.

International Reactions and Future Outlook

As the situation unfolds, both nations face pressure to manage their rivalry without further destabilizing the region. Afghanistan’s condemnation of the strikes highlights its commitment to defending its sovereignty, while Pakistan’s military actions demonstrate its determination to combat terrorism. The interplay between these forces could influence the broader geopolitical landscape, particularly as the Afghan Taliban consolidate power and militant groups continue to operate across borders.

With tensions at a peak, the international community watches closely for signs of de-escalation. However, the immediate fallout from the airstrikes suggests that the conflict will persist, fueled by mutual accusations and the persistent threat of cross-border attacks. The next steps in the diplomatic process will determine whether this confrontation leads to renewed cooperation or deeper division between the two neighbors.

Leave a Comment